Generated by The Taste Machine
Generated by The Taste Machine
Generated by The Taste Machine
Generated by The Taste Machine

The Taste Machine

The Taste Machine is an API service that generates images through a trained aesthetic intelligence system.

Try it below

Drop images here

The Idea

Smarter models lift the bar — sharper reasoning, better alignment, and as a result, better aesthetics. But the taste we actually want isn't an average — it comes from unique personal experiences, judgement, and subtraction. The Taste Machine is a learning layer between your brief and whatever the frontier model is, adding the personal angle and the extra few inches that scale alone won't give you. A different take on the probability-maxing game.

How it works

The Taste Machine starts from a set of reference images. A taste training engine distils the high-level aesthetic into a compact taste profile — a small model that captures that specific taste. When you send in a brief, a taste decoder turns that profile into a detailed, taste-informed instruction, which the underlying image-generation model then follows to produce the final design.

Taste Machine pipeline: references feed a taste training engine, which produces a taste profile that the taste decoder uses to guide the final image

How it compares

Same brief, three different approaches: the brief sent as-is, an LLM-polished prompt (or Lovart Agent's reasoned design where shown), and The Taste Machine.

A poster for designclaw's next meetup in Shanghai

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 01
Lovart AgentLovart Agent — case 01
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 01

Design a toy concept for children aged 6–9 that feels educational, playful, and safe while standing out on retail shelves.

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 06
Lovart AgentLovart Agent — case 06
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 06

Let's design an animal character in bear shape with a rabbit ear for children

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 07
Lovart AgentLovart Agent — case 07
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 07

Design a fashion campaign image in an edgy editorial style

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 09
Lovart AgentLovart Agent — case 09
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 09

A poster for the TV series Stranger Things' new season launch

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 14
LLM polishedLLM polished — case 14
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 14

A magazine cover of countryside life, slow pace but full of excitement

Raw image model outputRaw image model output — case 04
LLM polishedLLM polished — case 04
The Taste MachineThe Taste Machine — case 04

By the “numbers”

An informal scoring across 4 dimensions, comparing 5 models/methods on relevant tasks.

Not a benchmark — these are my own evaluations from conversations with ~20 experienced designer friends over 30–40 sample tasks. Treat it as a directional read on where The Taste Machine sits on average, not a precise measurement.

General aesthetics

NBPImage2LLMLovartTTM

Instruction following

NBPImage2LLMLovartTTM

Creative exploration

NBPImage2LLMLovartTTM

Realism on photos

NBPImage2LLMLovartTTM
NBP·Raw Nano Banana ProImage2·Raw GPT Image 2LLM·LLM-polished prompt + Nano Banana ProLovart·Lovart Agent + Nano Banana ProTTM·The Taste Machine + Nano Banana Pro

Reading this chart

Reach for it when

  • You're exploring options creatively and want above-average aesthetics
  • You're generating photo-based work that needs realism with creative direction
  • The output should carry some depth — considered visual choices or quiet storytelling
  • You have a vague direction and are happy to let the model take it somewhere that surprises you

Skip it when

  • You just need something that looks fine — GPT Image 2 gets there with less effort
  • You're editing an image — Nano Banana Pro with direct instructions is still the best option
  • You want iterative design development without knowing exactly what you want at the start — try Lovart Agent (though The Taste Machine should match it once the self-improving feedback skill system ships)

One endpoint. Brief in, image out.

No prompt engineering required. The taste system handles the complexity.

Request
curl -X POST https://api.thetastemachine.com/v1/generate \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "brief": "A minimal poster for a Tokyo
      coffee shop, warm tones, editorial feel",
    "model": "nano-banana-pro",
    "taste": "default",
    "aspect_ratio": "3:4"
  }'
Response
{
  "task_id": "aBcDeFgHiJkLmNoP",
  "status": "complete",
  "result": {
    "image_url": "https://cdn.thetastemachine.com/
      gen/abc123.png",
    "prompt_used": "A softly lit interior of a
      minimalist Tokyo kissaten...",
    "expires_at": "2026-04-14T00:00:00Z"
  },
  "credits_consumed": 10
}

How do I use it

On the website

Use the workspace directly — type a brief, pick your taste profile, generate.

Open Workspace

Via the API

Integrate into your app with a single endpoint. Send a brief, get an image.

Read the Docs

Through an AI agent

Give the API docs to your AI agent — Claude, GPT, or any framework — and let it generate on your behalf.

API Reference

The Progress

Live

Image input with taste-aware processing

Go beyond text-only prompts. Supply reference images alongside your brief and the taste engine analyses them as part of the generation — extracting composition, palette, and stylistic cues to produce results that stay true to your visual intent.

Live

API with taste profiles

The API is live with the basic ability to generate images guided by taste. Choose from existing taste profiles based on your task.

Next

Train your own taste profile

Upload references, curate examples, and the system learns your unique aesthetic preferences.

Upcoming

Self-improving skill system

The engine learns from errors and feedback, becoming more customised to your taste the more you use it.

Upcoming

Text and video generation

Same taste intelligence, different output formats. Generate copy and video with the same learned aesthetic.

Honest Notes

Where the project stands today — what works, what doesn't, and what's coming.

01

Two taste profiles to start with

Two profiles ship in the current version. The default one is generic but tuned toward poster and graphic design. The second is trained on realistic photography and aims for a more photographic look in its outputs.

02

Custom taste profiles are the next step

The point of The Taste Machine isn't just to improve taste — it's to control the output through the input, the taste profile. The natural next step is letting users upload their own references and train custom profiles. I'm not there yet.

03

Iteration sharpens results

In my own testing, iterating on a generation reliably returns better and more aligned results. The product doesn't surface that loop yet — it's on the way in a future update.

04

How The Taste Machine compares to GPT Image 2

GPT Image 2's raw output has significantly better taste than raw Nano Banana Pro, and it almost closes the gap that The Taste Machine opens up over the raw Nano Banana Pro model. On most tasks, GPT Image 2 and The Taste Machine sit in roughly the same range.

The theoretical advantage of this design — pending more extensive testing — is that taste here is customisable. GPT Image 2 has a fairly specific aesthetic incline across many types of content. The Taste Machine doesn't have to.

05

Why The Taste Machine is tuned to Nano Banana Pro

I've also tried running The Taste Machine with GPT Image 2 as the underlying generator, and the current design is very much tuned for Nano Banana Pro. GPT Image 2 shines when you hand it a vague brief and let it improvise and surprise you. The Taste Machine does the opposite — it produces a highly detailed prompt to instruct the image model. That kind of instruction works well with Nano Banana Pro, but not so much with GPT Image 2.

06

Image reference is a reference, not an edit

The image reference mode in The Taste Machine works differently from using Nano Banana Pro's raw model. Treat the input as a reference rather than an image to edit — for some cases that behaviour is exactly what you want.

07

Where the current profiles fall short

The two profiles available today don't perform equally well across every task. Logo design often returns weak results from either profile. Product design also struggles with the generic profile — internally I've trained narrower product-design profiles that performed noticeably better, but those are highly targeted to specific design tasks and aren't part of this release.

08

The bet, and where it might break

The idea behind The Taste Machine is to build an external system that evolves alongside image-generation models, because I don't think controllable taste is something you get for free from a more intelligent foundational model. Could that turn out to be a bitter lesson once the foundational models advance further? I genuinely don't fully know. By design it shouldn't, but different models behave very differently — the fact that GPT Image 2 doesn't naturally fit the current design is one signal, and the next major upgrade to Nano Banana could produce equally surprising shifts.

There's also the coverage question: I haven't tested enough taste profiles to know whether this approach holds up across every kind of task, and some of that may be bottlenecked by the foundational model itself. Despite those concerns, I've decided to release it and let it be tested in the open. Let's see what happens.

Community

Join the conversation

Share your results, get feedback, and help shape The Taste Machine. The Discord is where I hang out with users and listen to feedback.

Join the Discord

Stop engineering prompts. Start describing what you want.

The Taste Machine handles the gap between your intent and a good image.